This document describes a problem where your users might not get their messages synced between Cisco Unity Connection and Microsoft Exchange 2010. This problem might arise with a new setup or might interfere with an existing setup. Recent changes brought by Exchange 2010 Service Pack 2 (SP2) Rollup 4 (RU4) could be part of the cause.
The synchronization problem usually occurs with users that have a large number of items in their inbox, but it can happen with other mailbox sizes as well. There has been a change in the way Microsoft Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4 applies the throttling limit.
Cisco documentation states:
"Prior to Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4, the throttling limit was calculated against the calling account (In Our Case Service Account). Starting with, Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4, this limit has been changed. Now, the charges are counted against the target mailbox rather than the calling account."
This procedure describes how to investigate and verify the problem:
CsMBXSync: 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23
CsEWS: 10,11,12,13
Connection Mailbox Sync
Connection Tomcat
12:38:48.095 |13196,,,CsMbxSync,20,Created Service Entry Handler withThe key information is the Subscriber Oid, which is {019b9589-d0b4-440f-8afd-dc99ba67547e} in this example. Any line that contains this Oid refers to this user. You can now get more information if you search on the Subscriber Oid.
retry count 1 for Srvc Entry Data: (Cnx Mbx Id: Cnx Mbx Id: (Mbx Uid:
{11f4a1b5-7758-434a-b66e-f84889b923f2}, Inbox Folder Uid:
{6d08496c-9f8c-4cb4-a828-a38a3d9b7d97}, Mail Store: UnityMbxDb1, Inbox
Folder Name: inbox), Srvc Data: External Srvc Data:
(Ext Srvc Oid: {85ee84a7-0bb6-457f-8cce-2fbf2fae5ad7}, Display Name: UM
Sevices 1, Auth Scheme: 2, Is Enabled: 1, Srvc Supports Sync: 1 , Exch Do
Auto Discover: 0, Exch Do Auto Discover 2003: 0, Security Transport Type:
1, Server: 192.168.5.5, Service Account: Test, Service Password: XXXXXXXXX,
Service
Type: 4, Exch Service Type: 1, Trust Cert Dir:
/usr/local/platform/.security/tomcat/trust-certs/, Ldap Security Transport
Type: 0, Ldap Validate Server Certificate: 0, Validate Server Certificate:
0, Notification Type: 0, Is Impersontaion Enabled: 1, Proxy Ip Address: ),
Mbx Data: Mbx Data:
(Email Addr: user@mylab.com, Subscriber Oid:
{019b9589-d0b4-440f-8afd-dc99ba67547e}, Sync Enabled: 1, SESM Oid:
{ac8b5b58-766b-4ccf-b444-525606562f18}, DTMFAccess ID: 111))
12:38:48.281 |13459,172.16.10.31,{019b9589-d0b4-440f-8afd-dc99ba67547e},
CsEws,14,endElement>>> 0:0 - MessageText = The server cannot service this
request right now. Try again later.
12:38:48.281 |13459,172.16.10.31,{019b9589-d0b4-440f-8afd-dc99ba67547e},
CsEws,14,startElement>>> 0:0 - ResponseCode =
12:38:48.281 |13459,172.16.10.31,{019b9589-d0b4-440f-8afd-dc99ba67547e},
CsEws,14,endElement>>> 0:0 - ResponseCode = ErrorServerBusy
This output indicates that EWS has timed out the request based on the current EWS policy on the Exchange Server.
To resolve this problem, adjust your EWS policy based on this updated documentation: Configuring Cisco Unity Connection 9x and Microsoft Exchange for Unified Messaging: Removing EWS Limits for the Unified Messaging Serivces Account for Cisco Unity Connection (Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4 and Later).
This procedure describes how to create a new EWS policy with unlimited EWS connections. The new policy will allow users who experienced the ErrorServerBusy problem to be able to work properly:
New-ThrottlingPolicy -Name "<ConnectionUnifiedMessagingServicesPolicy>"where ConnectionUnifiedMessagingServicesPolicy is the name the policy you want to create.
-EWSMaxConcurrency $null -EWSMaxSubscriptions $null -EWSPercentTimeInCAS
$null -EWSPercentTimeInMailboxRPC $null -EWSFindCountLimit $null
-EWSPercentTimeinAD $null
Set-ThrottlingPolicyAssociation -Identity
"<ConnectionUnifiedMessagingusermailbox>" -ThrottlingPolicy
"<ConnectionUnifiedMessagingServicesPolicy>"
where:
ConnectionUnifiedMessagingusermailbox is the name of the user mailbox.Get-ThrottlingPolicyAssociation -Identity
"<ConnectionUnifiedMessagingusermailbox>" | findstr "ThrottlingPolicy"
Revision | Publish Date | Comments |
---|---|---|
1.0 |
02-Oct-2013 |
Initial Release |